top of page

Creating More Paths to Home Ownership

Use the Housing and Infrastructure We Already Have to Help Residents Own Homes.

Housing affordability isn't only about how many units we build. It is also about how many realistic opportunities we create for people to own a home.

We should be looking at whether some of the buildings and infrastructure we already have can create new ownership opportunities without always requiring entirely new subdivisions and infrastructure.

Think of a Semi-Detached Home

The basic principle is something we already understand.

In a semi-detached home, two families can live side by side in the same overall structure. Each family can have its own living space and own its own home.

If ownership can work horizontally, why shouldn't we explore where it can work vertically?

Imagine an appropriate three-storey building containing three independent homes—one on each floor—with each unit separately owned.

Or consider a commercial building where a business occupies the ground floor while independently owned residential units exist above it.

Ontario already has legal ownership structures, including condominium ownership, that can allow individual units within the same building to be separately owned.

So the question isn't simply whether separate ownership within one building is possible.
The question is whether Greater Sudbury is making it as practical, straightforward and affordable as possible where it can be done safely and responsibly.

Turn Appropriate Existing Buildings Into Ownership Opportunities
Instead of thinking only about building new housing, we should also examine existing buildings that may have the structure, location and municipal services needed to support additional ownership opportunities.
In appropriate cases, a larger home or building might be converted into multiple properly designed units, with each unit having clearly defined ownership, responsibilities and protections.
This could create new homes while making better use of roads, water, sewer and other infrastructure that taxpayers have already paid to build.

Helping Seniors Stay in Their Homes
There is another potential benefit.
Consider a senior who owns a larger home but no longer needs—or can no longer manage—the entire space.
Where the property and building are suitable, creating a separate unit could potentially allow that homeowner to remain in their neighbourhood, reduce the cost of maintaining the property, and create another housing opportunity.
Any changes must respect building and fire safety requirements and include appropriate protections for residents and existing tenants.
The objective isn't to weaken standards. It is to give residents more options.

What I Would Ask Sudbury to Do
I would ask staff to examine our zoning, property standards, building requirements, planning processes and municipal fees to determine:
• where this type of ownership is already possible;
• what municipal barriers currently make appropriate conversions unnecessarily difficult or expensive;
• whether zoning rules unnecessarily prevent suitable vertical or mixed-use ownership arrangements;
• whether approval processes can be simplified where established safety and planning requirements are met; and
• whether municipal fees accurately reflect the amount of work required for these applications.
This isn't about allowing every building to be divided or lowering construction standards. Not every property will be suitable.
It is about identifying where it does make sense and ensuring municipal rules aren't unnecessarily standing in the way.

Use What We Already Have
Every new ownership opportunity doesn't necessarily require a new subdivision.
Sometimes the building already exists. The road already exists. The water and sewer already exist. The neighbourhood already exists.
We already understand the principle when two homes share a wall. We should be willing to explore that same principle vertically—carefully, responsibly and with proper protections.
If we can use the housing and infrastructure we already have to give more residents a realistic path to home ownership, it is an option worth pursuing.

bottom of page